Effects That Caffeine Consumption

cause That caffein eruptlay caffein is the most commonly pulmonary tuberculosisd mind-altering substance in the United States (Roehrs Roth, 2008). Regular coffee drinkers work through an median(a) of 200-500mg of caffein per twenty-four seconds (Julien, 2005). caffein is effect in a grand variety of de nonations including coffee, tea, energy drinks, chocolate and some over the counter medications (Roehrs Roth, 2008). Upon purpose, caffein reaches peak plasma levels in 30-75 minutes and has a half(prenominal) bearing of 3-7 hours when run throughd in a sensation dose (Roehrs Roth, 2008). When consumed in great(p)er quantities, the half life is extended (Roehrs Roth, 2008). Caffeines high rate of economic use whitethorn be due(p) to the desirable effects it produces, such as addition psychological alertness, improved flow of thought and of course, feelings of wakefulness (Julien, 2005). Caffeine is non with proscribed its hateful effects caffein enj oyment may form a cast out effect on tasks which require fine motor skills, complex arithmetic skills, or precise timing (Julien, 2005).Structurally, caffein is similar to adenosine. In the brain, adenosine decreases flighty firings and inhibits neurotransmitter release (Roehrs Roth, 2008). Caffeine works as an adenosine antagonist pulley-block adenosine receptors in the brain. As a consequence, caffein prevents adenosine from decreasing neural firings, leading to an amplification in firings, and the stimulant effects caffein is salutary known for (Roehrs Roth, 2008). Caffeines blocking of adenosine receptors leads to dopamine release in the prefrontal cortex, causing caffeines alerting effects (Julien, 2005). While discontinuation of caffeine employment may produce drug withdrawal symptoms, caffeine does not enamour the dopaminergic structures associated with rewards and addiction (Julien, 2005). Typical withdrawal symptoms take on headache, drowsiness, fatigue, and proscribe mood (Julien, 2005).It is often difficult to estimate the measurement of caffeine a person consumes due to great variability in the bar of caffeine per beverage (particularly coffee), exclusion of new caffeinated products on questionnaires, and variation in consumption from day to day. It is uniformwise difficult to compargon results in the midst of studies due to a great metre of variation in methods of measuring caffeine consumption levels (Shohet Landrum, 2001). A try by Shohet Landrum (2001) of undergrad university students implemented the use of an updated version of the caffeine consumption questionnaire as well as looking at at chronotype and age. The caffeine Consumption questionnaire decreases a great deal of inaccuracy of caffeine consumption measurement. Shohet Landrum (2001) found that the average role player in the champaign consumed 1597.6mg/ week. They besides found that level of caffeine consumption is positively correlated with age. It was speculated that this make up may be an effort to compensate for decreased metabolism and resultant decrease in energy (Shohet Landrum, 2001). In the same study, in that location was no evidentiary unlikeness in caffeine consumption betwixt males and females (Shohet Landrum, 2001). Caffeine consumption in the change surface was higher among older people, who tended to be sunrise-types (Shohet Landrum, 2001).The effects that caffeine consumption has on eternal rest are extensive. Orbeta, Overpeck, Ramcharrin, Kogan Ledski (2006) found in a study of American high coach students that those who reported a high rate of caffeine consumption also reported much difficulty angle of diping a stillness and felt more than tired in the sunup. In a number of studies, caffeine administration in alter amounts importantly reduced numerate slumber duration and increase quiet onset latency (Roehrs Roth, 2008). any(prenominal) studies also found a diminution in percentage o f slow wave stillness after caffeine administration (Roehrs Roth, 2008). In a study where caffeine was administered prior to calmness, electroencephalogram ghostlike power density was reduced in the .75 4.5 Hz band. In a parallel study, men were administered 200 mg of caffeine upon open-eyed (0700 h) still sensed a reduction in EEG spectral power density in the .75 4.5 Hz range in the succeeding night peacefulness (Landolt, Werth, Borbely, Dijk, 1995). In this same study, list remainder m and remainder efficiency were reduced pursuance caffeine administration in the morning. Power density was reduced in the .25 .5 Hz range, and enhanced in the 11.25 12.00 Hz and 13.25-14.00 Hz ranges for NREM snooze (Landolt et al., 1995). Though a single 200 mg dose of caffeine in the morning understandably watchs pause propensity and power density of the EEG in the incidental quiescence episode, there was no deterioration in subjective sleep grapheme, and there is not a se vere disruption of sleep persistence (Landolt et al., 1995). In contrast, a study by Sanchez-Ortuno, Moore, Taillard, Valtat, Leger, Damien, Bioulac, and Philip (2005)found that up to octad cups of coffee consumed by regular coffee drinkers was not associated with reduced TST. there was also no consanguinity found amidst caffeine consumption and day sequence sleepiness in musicians consuming up to eightsome cups daily (Sanchez-Ortuno et al., 2005).The chronotype of an individual may be related to caffeine consumption. Chronotypes are a optence for being active during a particular clipping of day (Giannotti, Cortesi, Sebastiani, Ottaviano, 2002). Some individuals may be categorized as sunrise-Types. Morning Types prefer to wake early in the morning, retire earlier in the evening, and are most active in the early hours of the day, where as flush-Types prefer to rise later, and follow in activities later in the day. Others may fall somewhere in the midst of the morning- type and evening-type extreme. Daily physiological rhythms such as core out body temperature, blood pressure and hormone secretions set out from one chronotype to anformer(a). Morningness and Eveningness also tend to vary with age, with older adults generally demonstrating a druthers for morning action mechanism, and younger adults a preference for evening application (Giannotti et al., 2002). A study by Giannotti et al. (2002) of adolescents found that as they approached young adulthood, their circadian preference shifted more towards Eveningness. Giannotti et al. (2002) also found that Evening types tended to consume more caffeine, particularly in the morning. This may be due to forced pressure to adhere to a schedule more appropriate for those with a preference for morning action (Giannotti et al., 2002). In a study of both men and women with different, but quick-frozen work schedules by Ana Aden (1994) it was found that caffeine consumption change magnitude with preferen ce for evening. Evening types consumed more caffeine than neutral types, and neutral types consumed more caffeine than morning types. Interestingly, a large percentage of evening types were found to be caffeine abusers. 500 mg or more of caffeine per day was considered abuse (Aden, 1994).Adolescent evening types showed a more irregular sleep schedule and poorer subjective sleep forest in a study by Giannotti et al. (2002). Evening types also had higher sleep/wake behavior advance than morning types, an indication of more sleep problems in evening types (Giannotti et al., 2002). Evening type adolescents reported consuming more sleeping pills than morning types as well as more day m sleepiness (Gianotti et al., 2002). Evening types had a greater tendency to fall asleep at school, and attention problems as well (Giannotti et al., 2002).An increase in the accessability of engineering like computers, internet, television, and MP3 players may also shock caffeine consumption as well as sleep. A study by Calamaro, Mason, Radcliffe (2009) found that adolescents with higher sets on the multi-tasking index also reported higher caffeine consumption, increase daytime sleepiness, change magnitude incidents of falling asleep at school, and decreased total sleep time. Only 20% of the teenagers in this study received the recommended 8-10 hours of sleep for their age (Calamaro et al., 2009). 33% reported falling asleep at school on a regular basis, and 37% and 42% take naps on school days and weekends respectively (Calamaro et al., 2009).Clearly there is a great deal of interaction between caffeine consumption and chronotype. There is also apparent interaction between caffeine consumption and sleep smell. Chronotype had an influence on sleep woodland in adolescents, There is also a relationship between caffeine consumption and sleep quality and multi-tasking/ engineering science use. The present study aimed to canvass the interrelationship between these variables in a group of university students. It was hypothe sized that students who reported higher caffeine consumption would report land subjective sleep quality. This relationship would be demonstrated by a significant positive correlation between level of caffeine consumption cond by Caffeine Consumption Questionairre (mg/week) (Modified from Landrum, 1992) and get on the Pittsburgh respite fibre index finger (a higher lay down indicates poorer sleep quality) (Buysse et al., 1989). It was also predicted that students who were evening-types would consume a greater amount of caffeine than morning-type students. This would be demonstrated by a significant negative correlation between Morningness-Eveningness Questionairre (a impose come to indicates a preference for eveningness) (Horne stberg, 1976) and daily caffeine consumption (mg/week) . Next, it was predicted that evening types would experience more subjective sleep problems than morning types. More specifically, there would be a significant negative relationship between add togethers on the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire and Pittsburgh balance fiber Index accounting. The fourth prediction was that students who scored higher on the night Activities (Multi-tasking) Index would also consume a greater amount of caffeine. Specifically, there would be a positive relationship between Caffeine Consumption Questionnaire score and Nighttime Activities (Multi-Tasking) Index score. Finally, we predicted that students who were evening-types would use more technology between 2100 and 0600. This would be indicated by a significant negative relationship between Morningness-Eveningness score and Nighttime Activities (Multi-Tasking) Index score.MethodParticipantsParticipants in this study were 49 undergraduate students enrolled in a pile and stimulant course and Trent University. Student age ranged from 20-31 years. Mean age of participants was 22.12 years (SD 2.26). 9 males and 39 females participated in this study.MaterialsMaterials used were 4 established questionairres. The Morningness-Eveningness Questionairre (Horne stberg, 1976) was used to determine an individuals chronotype (preferred or peak time of day (morning, evening or neutral)). get ahead range from 16-86. Questionnaires were scored as follows (16-30) Definitely Evening, (31-41) Moderately Evening, (42-58) Neutral, (59-69) Moderately Morning, (70-86) Definitely Morning.The Pittsburgh kip Quality Index was used to measure students overall sleep quality (Buysse et al. 1989). Scores range from 0-21, with lower scores indicating better sleep quality.A modified version of the Caffeine Consumption Questionairre (Landrum, 1992) was used to estimate hitchical caffeine consumption in students. Participants indicate how much caffeine they consume in the morning, afternoon, evening, and night time. Students also indicate the source of caffeine (small coffee, intermediate tea, downy drink, large coffee). The caffeine content o f each type and size of drink was determined by Calamaro et al. (2009) and Roehrs and Roth (2008).Finally, the Night-Time Activities Questionnaire, modified from Calamaro et al. (2009) was used to measure the amount of time students spent doing various technology based activities in the evening (900pm 600am). Activities such as watching television, and using the computer were included). A multi-tasking index was then created by adding the total hours of time spent on all tasks and dividing this number by 9 (the total hours between 900 pm and 600 am). A student who engages in 9 hours of activity in that 9 hour period would receive a score of 1.0 (A score greater than 1 is possible, for example, if a student was listening to symphony and using the computer at the same time).ProcedureParticipants filled out all four questionnaires during a scheduled lecture period. The Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire and the Pittsburg pause Quality Index were scored by students after completio n, while the other two questionnaires were scored by the instructor.ResultsCaffeine Consumption QuestionairreThe pie-eyed level of caffeine consumption in milligrams per week for the morning (0600 1200) period was 685.63 (SD = 1032.21). Mean afternoon (1200 1800) period caffeine consumption was 394.90 (SD = 554.39). The mean level of evening (1800 0200) period caffeine consumption in these university students was 320.49 (SD = 355.48) and mean night time (0200 0600) caffeine consumption was 24.84 (SD = 64.49) milligrams per week. Mean caffeine consumption total in milligrams per week was 1425.86 (SD = 1737.82). These results were similar to results found by Shohet et al. in that the greatest amount of caffeine was being consumed in the morning time. There was a slightly lower level of total caffeine consumption in our study compared to the results found by Shohet et al., with a difference of 171.74 mg/week between the two studies. This amount is equivalent to about 1 cup of cof fee. (MORE COMPARISON surrounded by OURS AND SHOHET..SEE TABLE 2 IN PAPER AT BATA)The mean source of the caffeine consumed weekly in milligrams was 974.69 (SD = 1713.09) for coffee, 270.12 (SD = 338.18) for tea, 99.24 (SD = 163.39) for brushed drinks, 45.06 (SD = 127.23) for energy drinks, and 36.73 (SD = 74.44) for hot chocolate. The vast majority of caffeine consumed weekly by these university students was via coffee while rattling infinitesimal caffeine was consumed in hot chocolate.Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ)The mean MEQ score was 43.59 (SD = 12.25). Scores ranged from 24 to 69. 16.33% of participants were Definitely-Evening (n= 8), 34.69% were Moderately-Evening (n=17), 36.73% were Neutral (n=18) and 12.24% were Moderately-Morning. None of the participants were Definitely-Morning types.Pittsburgh balance Quality Index (PSQI)Each subscale of the PSQI has a possible score of 0-3. The mean Subjective Sleep Quality score was 1.37 (SD = 0.83). The mean Sleep Ons et Latency score was 1.84 (SD = 1.01). The mean Sleep Duration score was 0.78 (SD = 0.82). The mean Habitual Sleep Efficiency score was 0.69 (SD = 0.98). The mean Sleep Disturbances score was 1.55 (SD = 1.14). The mean put on of Sleeping Medication was 0.37 (SD = 0.83), and the mean Daytime Dysfunction score was 1.35 (SD = 0.83). The mean total score on the PSQI was 7.78 (SD = 3.93). According to Buysse et al. (1988), a score greater than 5 indicates that someone is a poor sleeper. The mean score of our participants was at heart the range of abnormal. The greatest amount of sleep disturbance came from high sleep onset latency, while the least disruptive factor was reliance on the use of sleep medications.Night-Time Activities Questionnaire (NTAQ)The mean data for the activities included on the NTAQ are included in figure 1. The mean multi-tasking index of these night time activities is 0.60 (SD = 0.29). The range of multi-tasking index scores was 0.12 1.39. A score of 0.60 means that the participant was doing some combination of the activities on the NTAQ for 5.40 hours. (0.60 x 9 hours = 5.40) of the 9 hour sleep period. In the case of the score of 1.39, the participant was salty in an activity on the NTIQ for 12.51 hours. Since the measured period is only 9 hours, this participant was engaging in more than one activity at a time, for example, listening to MP3 player and online computer use.Results of Correlation AnalysisThere was a significant negative correlation between MEQ and Multi-Tasking Index. Morning types tended to have lower Multi-Tasking Index scores than Evening types, r = -.32, p add-in 1Correlations found between Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), PittsburgSleep Quality Index (PSQI), Multi-tasking Index, and Caffeine ConsumptionQuestionnaire. . _ MEQ PSQI Multi-Tasking .MEQ score -.16 -.32*PSQI score .03Caffeine ConsumptionCoffee -.06 .31* -.06Tea .20 -.20 -.08Hot Chocolate .13 -.18 .08Soft Drinks -.30* .02 .08Energy Drinks -.1 4 .20 .07. fit Caffeine -.06 .25 .01 .* p DiscussionWe predicted that participants who consumed a greater level of caffeine would have higher scores, indicating poorer sleep quality, on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Although total caffeine consumption level failed to predict a higher sleep quality score, there was a significant negative correlation between level of coffee consumption and PSQI.Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire Score was predicted to negatively correlate with score on the Caffeine Consumption Questionnaire. Total caffeine consumption did not significantly correlate with MEQ score. Level of caffeinated soft drink consumption did significantly correlate with MEQ with evening types consuming greater amounts of caffeinated soft drinks than morning-types.It was predicted that evening types would report more sleep problems via the PSQI. This correlation failed to reach moment in our digest. There is no significant difference between Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Ind ex score in evening-types from morning-types.We predicted that students who scored higher on the Nighttime Activities (Multi-tasking) Index would also consume a greater amount of caffeine. The analysis revealed no significant relationship between these variables.Our final prediction was that evening-types would engage in a greater level of technology use in the evening, as indicated by a significant negative relationship between MEQ score and Multi-Tasking Index. There was a significant relationship between MEQ and Multi-Tasking Index. Evening types did tend to engage in more activities involving technology between the hours of 2100 and 0600 than morning-types, as predicted.Using The Caffeine Consumption Questionnaire and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index as a measure, consumption of higher levels of caffeine did not did predict poorer sleep quality. Although several studies found that caffeine consumption increased sleep onset latency, decreased total sleep time and increased daytime sleepiness, we did not chance on that high levels of total caffeine consumption predicted a significantly poorer sleep quality score (Roehrs Roth, 2008). Although total caffeine consumption and PSQI were not correlated, caffeinated coffee consumption did predict a poorer sleep quality score. This contrasts findings by Sanchez-Ortunga et al. (2005) in which up to eight cups of coffee consumed by regular coffee drinkers did not result in a significantly lower TST. Although it should be taken into consideration that TST is only one persona of the PSQI.Contrary to our findings, Gianotti et al. (2002) found that Evening-types tended to consume a greater amount of caffeine than morning types. Ana Aden (1994) also found that daily caffeine consumption increased as preference for evening activity increased. Although these results contrast our findings, we did find a slight but significant relationship between consumption of caffeinated soft drinks and preference for evening.Gianotti et a l. (2002) also found that evening-type adolescents reported poorer subjective sleep quality than morning types. These evening-type adolescents also showed a more irregular sleep schedule. Evening types showed greater daytime sleepiness, increased relative frequency of falling asleep during the day, and other indications of poor sleep quality (Gianotti et al., 2002). Contrary to these findings, we found no relationship between PSQI score and chronotype.Although Calamero et al. (2009) found that those reporting an increased multi-tasking index score also consumed greater amounts of caffeine, we found no relationship between the two. We did, however, find a significant relationship between chronotype and multi-tasking index. Evening types tended to engage in more technologically based activities between 2100 and 0600. There was no introductory research available examining the relationship between chronotype and Night-time Activities/Multi-tasking Index. This may be a possible area o f further investigation. nonpareil limitation of this study is the leave out of diversity in the sample. The participants were a relatively small group of undergraduate psychology students between the age of 20-31. The small sample size may have made it difficult for motilitys in the data to reach significant levels. Also, chronotype and caffeine consumption have been shown to change over the lifetime, however, we were able to examine only a small window of young adulthood, leaving little opportunity for drastic variations. Also, being students, many of these participants may have schedules which vary drastically from day to day, as well as an increased frequency of engaging in late night activities with peers. These behaviours may have a confounding influence on many sleep variables. Thus, these findings may not be generalized to the population. Re-examining the same material with a larger and more diverse sample may yield more helpful results. This would be fairly simple to do s ince the questionnaires may be filled out with little guidance or instruction, and simply be distributed and returned by chain armor or electronically administered.Another limitation is that the entire data accrual procedure relied completely on student self-reports. The accuracy of these self-evaluations of sleep quality, sleep latency, and level of caffeine consumption may not have been accurate. Some questionnaires were also self scored, leaving open the opportunity for error in calculations. Although much of our analysis of caffeine consumptions effect on sleep quality failed to reach statistical significance, the trends in the data indicate that caffeine does seeming detrimentally influence sleep quality. As previous research has shown, the impact caffeine may have on daytime functioning and sleep may be greater than many people realize. Caffeine consumption may be leading to a poorer nights sleep, and this less recuperative sleep subsequently may lead to more caffeine consu mption the following day to compensate for the caffeine disrupted sleep of the night before. One can see how this may result in a caffeine/poor sleep cycle.Another interest finding was the correlation between chronotype and Multi-tasking index score. It would be interesting to investigate whether this relationship is due to evening-types engaging in more night-time activities in order to simply occupy the time between when they believe they should be sleeping and when they are able to sleep, or if the opportunity to occupy the mind and stave off sleep, and disrupting their natural activity time preference.Although we did not specifically make any predictions regarding Multi-tasking Index and PSQI, it is interesting to note that there was no relationship between Multi-tasking Index and PSQI. enquiry by Calamaro et al. (2009) found that a high Multi-tasking Index was related to sleep problems like difficulty falling asleep, decreased total sleep time and daytime sleepiness.There was n o relationship between chronotype and sleep quality in our study, despite findings of a significant relationship by Gianotti et al. (2002). Although the trend in our data leaned towards a similar relationship, it did not reach significance. The difference in our findings compared to Gianotti et al. (2008) may have to do with factors unique to adolescents.In summary, there is a significant relationship between Multi tasking and chronotype, PSQI and coffee consumption level. entirely other comparisons failed to reach significance. The trend in the data indicate that caffeine does indeed detrimentally effect sleep quality, but the degree of influence it has remains unclear.ReferencesAdan, A. (1994). Chronotype and personality factors in the daily consumption of alcohol and psychostimulants. Addiction, 89(4), 455-462.Buysse, D.J., Reynolds, C.F., Monk, T.H., Berman, S.R., Kupfer,D.J. (1989). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) A new instrument for psychiatric research and practi ce. Psychiatry Research, 28(2), 193-213.Calamaro, C.J., Mason, T.B., Ratcliffe, S.J. (2009). Adolescents living the 24/7 lifestyle effects of caffeine and technology on sleep duration and daytime functioning. Pediatrics, 123(6), 1005-1010.Gianotti, F., Cortesi, F., Sebastiani, T., Ottaviano, S. (2002). Circadian preference, sleep and daytime behaviour in adolescence. Journal of Sleep Research, 11(3), 191- 199.Julien, R.M. (2005). Caffeine and nicotine. In A primer of drug action. (10th ed., pp. 225-251). New York Worth Publishers.Landolt H.P., Werth, E., Borbely, A.A., Dijk, D.J. (1995). Caffeine intake (200 mg) in the morning affects human sleep and EEG power spectra at night. Brain Research, 675(1-2), 67-74.Landrum, R.E. (1992). College students use of caffeine and its relationship to personality. College Student Journal, 26(2), 151-155.Orbeta, R.L., Overpeck, M.D., Ramcharran, D., Kogan, M.D., Ladsky, R. (2006).High caffeine intake in adolescents associations with difficulty sleeping and feeling tired in the morning. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38(4), 451-453.Roehrs, T., Roth, T. (2008). Caffeine Sleep and daytime sleepiness. Sleep care for Reviews, 12(2), 153-162.Sanchez-Ortuno, M., Moore, N., Taillard, J., Valtat, C., Legar, D., Bioulac, B., Philip.,P. (2005). Sleep duration and caffeine consumption in a cut middle-aged working population. Sleep Medicine, 6(3), 247-251.Shohet, K.L., Landrum, R.E. (2001). Caffeine consumption questionnaire a regularise measure for caffeine consumption in undergraduate students.Psychology Reports